YOUR RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

ECHR, EU Directives, and the Charter of Fundamental Rights

Important Notice

This page is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It summarizes legal protections that may apply to individuals who experience religious discrimination within the European Union and the broader Council of Europe. It does not constitute legal advice and is not a substitute for consultation with a qualified legal practitioner. EU law is implemented differently across member states, and domestic legislation may provide additional or different protections. If you believe your rights have been violated, consult a licensed legal practitioner in your country.

I. The European Convention on Human Rights (Article 9)

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), adopted in 1950 under the auspices of the Council of Europe, provides the foundational protection for religious freedom across Europe. Article 9 is the central provision:

The Two Dimensions of Protection

Article 9 protects two distinct aspects of religious freedom:

The internal dimension (forum internum) covers the freedom to hold beliefs. This protection is absolute. No government may interfere with a person's right to hold, adopt, or change religious convictions. No person may be compelled to demonstrate views or behaviour associated with a particular religion. No person may be forced to disclose their religious beliefs.

The external dimension (forum externum) covers the freedom to manifest beliefs through worship, teaching, practice, and observance. This protection is qualified: it may be limited, but only where restrictions are (1) prescribed by law, (2) pursue a legitimate aim (public safety, order, health, morals, or the protection of the rights of others), and (3) are necessary and proportionate in a democratic society.

Scope of Protection

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has confirmed that Article 9 protects a wide range of beliefs, including:

The ECtHR does not assess the legitimacy or truth of religious beliefs. What matters is whether the belief has a sufficient level of cogency, seriousness, cohesion, and importance to engage Article 9 protection. The worship of the Olympian Gods, as part of a religious tradition with a documented history spanning millennia, would in all likelihood satisfy this threshold. Formal institutional registration is not required; the ECtHR examines the nature of the belief itself, not its administrative status.

The State's Positive Obligations

Article 9, read in conjunction with Article 1 (obligation to secure Convention rights), imposes positive obligations on states. This means governments must not only refrain from interfering with religious freedom, but must also take affirmative steps to protect individuals from religious violence, discrimination, and harassment by private persons and groups.

II. The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

Since the Treaty of Lisbon (2009), the Charter has the same legal force as the EU Treaties. It is binding on EU institutions and on EU Member States when they are implementing EU law. Article 10 mirrors the ECHR's Article 9, while Article 21 provides a broader non-discrimination guarantee that explicitly includes religion.

III. The Employment Equality Directive (2000/78/EC)

Council Directive 2000/78/EC establishes a general framework for combating discrimination in employment and occupation, including discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief. All 27 EU Member States are required to transpose this Directive into national law.

Scope of Application

The Directive covers:

Protection Against Victimization

The Directive requires Member States to protect employees against dismissal or other adverse treatment by the employer in retaliation for filing a complaint about religious discrimination or for participating in legal proceedings aimed at enforcing the principle of equal treatment. This anti-retaliation provision is critical: it means that filing a complaint cannot lawfully be used as a basis for adverse action against you.

Burden of Proof

Under the Directive, once you establish facts from which it may be presumed that direct or indirect discrimination has occurred, the burden of proof shifts to the employer to prove that there has been no breach of the principle of equal treatment. This is a significant procedural advantage for complainants.

IV. Workplace Protections

Religious Symbols at Work

The legality of workplace restrictions on religious symbols has been addressed in multiple CJEU and ECtHR decisions. The general principle: a blanket ban on all visible signs of political, philosophical, or religious beliefs may be permissible if it is applied consistently and pursues a legitimate aim (such as a policy of neutrality). However, a ban that targets a specific religion or that is applied selectively is likely to constitute direct discrimination under the Directive.

If your workplace permits employees of other faiths to display religious symbols (crosses, headscarves, etc.) but prohibits you from wearing symbols of your faith, this may constitute direct discrimination under the Directive. The specific analysis depends on the facts, including whether the employer has a uniformly applied neutrality policy, but selective enforcement against a particular faith is a strong indicator of unlawful discrimination.

Religious Holidays

While EU law does not mandate a uniform approach to religious holiday accommodation, the prohibition on indirect discrimination means that workplace policies which exclusively recognize holidays of dominant religions may, depending on the circumstances, constitute indirect discrimination against practitioners of other faiths. You may request reasonable accommodation for religious observances, and any refusal should be objectively justified by the employer.

Proselytization and Harassment

Repeated unwelcome proselytization, derogatory comments about your faith, exclusion from work groups, and social ostracism based on your religion may constitute harassment under the Directive when the conduct has the purpose or effect of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating, or offensive environment. Whether a specific set of facts meets this threshold depends on the severity, frequency, and context of the conduct. A pattern of repeated unwelcome behaviour is more likely to be actionable than an isolated incident.

V. Special Note: Greece

Greece, as the birthplace of the tradition upheld by the Temple of Zeus, has specific constitutional and legal provisions regarding religious freedom.

Article 13 of the Greek Constitution provides: "Freedom of religious conscience is inviolable. The enjoyment of civil rights and liberties does not depend on the individual's religious beliefs." It further guarantees that "all known religions shall be free and their rites of worship shall be performed unhindered and under the protection of the law."

Greece is a party to the ECHR, and the ECtHR has found Greece in violation of Article 9 in several cases (notably Kokkinakis v. Greece, 1993, and Thlimmenos v. Greece, 2000). Greek law also transposes the EU Employment Equality Directive through Law 3304/2005.

In 2017, the Greek government officially recognized Hellenic ethnic religion (Hellenismos) as a "known religion" under Greek law, granting it legal standing. This recognition is a significant precedent that strengthens the legal position of all worshippers of the Olympian Gods in Greece.

If you experience religious discrimination in Greece, you may file a complaint with the Greek Ombudsman (Synigoros tou Politi), the Hellenic Data Protection Authority, or pursue civil action through the Greek courts. You also have recourse to the ECtHR after exhausting domestic remedies.

VI. Key Case Law of the ECtHR

Kokkinakis v. Greece
Application No. 14307/88 (1993)

The Court's first major Article 9 judgment. Held that the conviction of a Jehovah's Witness for proselytism violated Article 9. Established that religious freedom is a foundation of democratic society and that restrictions must be proportionate. Of particular relevance: the Court confirmed that the state may not favour one religion over another.

Eweida and Others v. United Kingdom
Applications Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10, 36516/10 (2013)

The Court held that the right to manifest religion at work, including by wearing religious symbols, is protected under Article 9. Found a violation where an employer prohibited a Christian employee from wearing a visible cross when there was no evidence that the cross interfered with the employer's interests. Established that the right to manifest belief in the workplace is real and practical, not merely theoretical.

Thlimmenos v. Greece
Application No. 34369/97 (2000)

Held that the right not to be discriminated against under Article 14 (in conjunction with Article 9) is violated when states treat differently persons in analogous situations without objective justification, and also when they fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different.

Members of the Gldani Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses v. Georgia
Application No. 71156/01 (2007)

The Court found that Georgia violated Article 9 by failing to protect a minority religious group from physical attacks by adherents of the majority religion. Established the state's positive obligation to protect religious minorities from violence by private actors.

S.A.S. v. France
Application No. 43835/11 (2014)

While upholding France's ban on full-face coverings in public, the Court reaffirmed that Article 9 protects the right to manifest one's religion through clothing and symbols, and that any restriction must meet the strict necessity and proportionality tests.

VII. How to Enforce Your Rights

Step 1: National Remedies

You must first exhaust domestic remedies before applying to the European Court of Human Rights. In each EU member state, you can pursue relief through:

Step 2: The European Court of Human Rights

Filing an Application with the ECtHR
  1. Exhaust domestic remedies. You must have pursued all available remedies in your own country before applying to the ECtHR.
  2. File within six months. Applications must be submitted within six months of the final domestic decision (reduced to four months for judgments from February 1, 2022 onwards under Protocol 15).
  3. Complete the application form. Available at echr.coe.int. The form requires a clear statement of the facts, the Convention rights alleged to have been violated, and copies of relevant domestic decisions.
  4. No legal representation is required initially, but is strongly recommended for oral hearings.
  5. Legal aid may be available from the Court itself once a case is communicated to the respondent government.

Step 3: The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)

The CJEU interprets EU law, including the Employment Equality Directive. Individual citizens cannot directly bring cases to the CJEU, but a national court handling your case may refer questions of EU law interpretation to the CJEU through the "preliminary reference" procedure (Article 267 TFEU). If you believe EU law is at stake in your case, request that your national court make such a referral.

VIII. Resources and Contacts

Greece-Specific Resources
Key Legal Instruments
  • European Convention on Human Rights (1950), Article 9
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Articles 10, 21, 22
  • Council Directive 2000/78/EC (Employment Equality Directive)
  • Council Directive 2000/43/EC (Racial Equality Directive, covering intersecting grounds)
  • Treaty on European Union, Article 2 (values of human dignity, freedom, equality, rule of law, respect for human rights including rights of minorities)
  • Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 19 (power to combat discrimination based on religion)